swmaniacJoin Date: 2008-06-28
Post Count: 15773 |
I don't mean like "Instant Deletion" reportable, but I mean lock/delete the thread and warning/ban if it continues for a long time.
Some of this IS about the BC only places update - but seriously, it's getting absurd how many threads in here are TO REMOVE THE PREVIOUS UPDATE. You're not helping Roblox by suggesting they go back; going back may not even be practically possible if the code is intigrated (assuming Roblox doesn't keep extensive backups of every update ever).
It's not going to happen, they've said repeatedly that they're not removing an update just because you form a petition. Contrary to popular belief, Roblox is NOT required to obey your commands just because you got 500 people to agree in the comments (some of which you probably put on there yourself because it wasn't getting signed).
Were BC Only places going a bit too far? Yes, in my opinion; in their defense they encourage people to make 2 copies of their place, 1 BC and 1 NBC.
Should that mean that 100% of new threads are about them? NO!
I mean maybe if you showed that the vast majority of players (and they'd have to be BC members to, sorry NBC but you're not a big financial help to Roblox) hated BC Only places, then they may listen, but THEY AREN'T REQUIRED TO.
Spamming the forum full of this stuff isn't helping the matter, it's making it worse. It's also a polite code of conduct to keep 1 topic of discussion to 1 topic. This means there shouldn't be 80 protest threads.
Also, note how the title says "Nonconstructively," what that means is that if you can't provide a good argument for why to remove the update.
Good in this case means
-Makes logical points
-Points apply to more than one person; suggest a problem the majority or a large precentage of Roblox will have with the update.
"I suggest removing the recent update to make everything in the catalog free to OBCers because it ruins the Robloxian economy..." (NOT A REAL UPDATE OR SUGGESTION) - Is OK.
"REMOVE BC ONLY PLACES BECAUSE I CAN'T BUY BC!" Is NOT.
(NOTE: THIS IS NOT INTENDED TO BE AN ARGUMENT FOR OR AGAINST BC PLACES)
Tl;Dr - It should not be allowed to spam the forums with a billion protest threads against the current update. The only ones that should be allowed are those that actually make a reasonable and logical argument. |
|
swmaniacJoin Date: 2008-06-28
Post Count: 15773 |
Groan.
BUMP! |
|
swmaniacJoin Date: 2008-06-28
Post Count: 15773 |
Bump2 |
|
swmaniacJoin Date: 2008-06-28
Post Count: 15773 |
Bump3. |
|
RaheemJoin Date: 2008-02-11
Post Count: 8200 |
Agreed.
*gives cookie* |
|
|
what does Tl,DR mean? And i support |
|
|
RaheemJoin Date: 2008-02-11
Post Count: 8200 |
TL;DR
means
Too Long; Didn't Read |
|
swmaniacJoin Date: 2008-06-28
Post Count: 15773 |
Bump? |
|
ostinyoJoin Date: 2010-12-30
Post Count: 1233 |
I didn't even have to read the actual post to know this was a good idea.
Support!
Also E.Ma.il ROBLOX this idea... perhaps doing so would get it noticed more quickly. |
|
|
Awesome! We get banned for expressing our opinions on updates!! :D No. |
|
swmaniacJoin Date: 2008-06-28
Post Count: 15773 |
@Charizard
No, you get banned for filling 25 pages of the forum with the same message over and over again even though it's been said repeatedly, derailing RT and S&I, and affecting the overall workings of every forum on Roblox. |
|
|
Oh. Misinterpretation. Sorry. This idea isn't all bad. Support. |
|
swmaniacJoin Date: 2008-06-28
Post Count: 15773 |
Bump? |
|
swmaniacJoin Date: 2008-06-28
Post Count: 15773 |
Bump2. |
|
swmaniacJoin Date: 2008-06-28
Post Count: 15773 |
Bump3. |
|
rayco1Join Date: 2008-06-08
Post Count: 1309 |
Sure, whatever. It's not like I agree with the BC only places, but some people are just complaining about it, not constructively criticizing the idea, which I find stupid, but since the majority of the community is stupid, I've grown used to it. |
|
swmaniacJoin Date: 2008-06-28
Post Count: 15773 |
Bump, because apperently I didn't say it enough. |
|