of     2   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right

SGS
#39961456Friday, December 31, 2010 1:32 AM GMT

Admins, Manager, Mods, all of you that work for ROBLOX, what are you thinking, A new year is coming upon all the happy ROBLOXians, and you JUST RUINED IT. Now HOW? You might ask? Simple. The new site update. The OLD games page was a very small piece of the old ROBLOX history. And you just took it away. Ban me, I dont care, I really am coming upon the edge of leaving ROBLOX.com, my most favorite website ever, I spent my Christmas money on a new laptop so I could play ROBLOX more without lag. (IT costs $500.00). And you just ruined my happy moment of getting a new laptop to play with all my friends, challenge other players in a duel, and more. The LEAST you can do for ME and the others that dislike this new update is : Update account settings so incase we want, we can switch back to old games page on our account without having the BC ONLY games. Like I said:Ban me from my most favorite site ever in my life. Do it. Ruin a kid's time on ROBLOX, then you can have a Happy New Year knowing you hurt a poor child's heart. What happened to our "free online virtual world"? What happened to it? Cause I want it back. You guys are getting GREEDY with your money, making other players not get to play their favorite games on ROBLOX such as Apples To Apples. Etc. And I know you guys, (not really just in a way o_O) I know that more than 70% of all ROBLOXians don't like the new update. And I'm pretty sure you forum mods are going to delete this thread so the admins won't see it. Mainly because YOU DIDN'T READ THE WHOLE THING (probably). But if one of you forum mods on ROBLOX.COM Actually read this far, than you sir/ma'am, have a heart. (Unless you disagree with my thread) :D. And no trolling noobs can post on this because I locked the replies on this thread, Thankyou for your time and have a Happy New Year. Sonic1mario~SGS
RevolutionGG
#39961530Friday, December 31, 2010 1:33 AM GMT

http://www.roblox.com/Forum/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=39942358 Let this die, pl0x. We already heard enough.
MrQuality
#39961669Friday, December 31, 2010 1:34 AM GMT

Good for you. :3
RevolutionGG
#39961838Friday, December 31, 2010 1:36 AM GMT

@MrQuality: It's nice if you make sure whom you're talking to.
MrQuality
#39961929Friday, December 31, 2010 1:37 AM GMT

I was talking to both of you.
RevolutionGG
#39962035Friday, December 31, 2010 1:38 AM GMT

Touché.
MrQuality
#39962175Friday, December 31, 2010 1:39 AM GMT

You, I'm not. How can you tell what mood I was in when I first posted?
RevolutionGG
#39962287Friday, December 31, 2010 1:40 AM GMT

I wasn't talking about your mood. You didn't make it clear who you were talking to.
SGS
#39962524Friday, December 31, 2010 1:42 AM GMT

Then why did you say he said who he was talking to?
RevolutionGG
#39962637Friday, December 31, 2010 1:44 AM GMT

@SGS: Why did who say.
MrQuality
#39962722Friday, December 31, 2010 1:44 AM GMT

So, in real life. Let's say there's two people. One person was named eric and the other connor. Connor: At Eric, hello. Eric: What? My point here is that I don't always want to type @(Name).
pie648
#39962755Friday, December 31, 2010 1:45 AM GMT

srry to say, they dont care about just one customer XD
RevolutionGG
#39963026Friday, December 31, 2010 1:47 AM GMT

@Mr: Here in internet, we don't talk face-to-face; especially on the forums. In real world: Let's say you're in a party. Lots of people, nice drinks, blah blah blah... You attempt to talk to someone. You say "Hello" If there is eye-contact, you can justify who you're talking to. Here on the internet, however, there is no eye-contact. So you could be saying words to anyone, unless in a chat with only two people.
SGS
#39963222Friday, December 31, 2010 1:49 AM GMT

I like you, no matter how angry you are right now.
RevolutionGG
#39963270Friday, December 31, 2010 1:50 AM GMT

@SGS: Are J00 Howmow? Oh, remove the 'w's.
MrQuality
#39963342Friday, December 31, 2010 1:50 AM GMT

Unless, you of course, no one types before you. Unfortunately...you did. So that's why you're probably wondering who am I talking to.
RevolutionGG
#39963757Friday, December 31, 2010 1:54 AM GMT

@Mr: So, (at the start) you were talking to?
MrQuality
#39964078Friday, December 31, 2010 1:57 AM GMT

If you still don't know it's obvious I'm talking to SGS.
RevolutionGG
#39964241Friday, December 31, 2010 1:58 AM GMT

FINALLY. It is now came out of the uncertainness!
RevolutionGG
#39964304Friday, December 31, 2010 1:59 AM GMT

out from the*
MrQuality
#39964376Friday, December 31, 2010 1:59 AM GMT

Really? -_-
Wulfchow
#39964380Friday, December 31, 2010 1:59 AM GMT

I don't care anymore, I've seen enough of this...
SGS
#39964498Friday, December 31, 2010 2:00 AM GMT

OMG! I posted that on the wrong forum, sorry!
Wulfchow
#39964519Friday, December 31, 2010 2:00 AM GMT

Incase your wondering, I'm tlaking to SGS.
Wulfchow
#39964663Friday, December 31, 2010 2:01 AM GMT

*talking

    of     2   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right