of     1   

anakinJCL
#46538047Monday, May 02, 2011 1:04 PM GMT

Simple, you've all heard of the gravity suggestion right? Good. Well, I'm here to improve it. If I was trying to design my own planet here's what I'd do to make one. First to get rid of normal gravity, I'd click workspace and un-check the box "Gravity" or I can set the number of gravity to 0%. (100% is normal gravity) of course I can keep it on, and it won't effect bricks with gravity. Now, I want to make a planet, so I super size a sphere, and click insert> object> gravity. Now I un-check the gravity ratio (1% of gravity equals 10 stud range, 1 stud size equals 0.1% gravity, so a ten stud plate pulls everything within 10 studs towards it) and set it so everything within 1000 studs gets pulled at 100% gravity. I can also ad "Gravity Fields" that occur outside the gravity range, so if I added a gravity field, it would pull things at a different gravity percent beyond the 1000 stud mark, so I set it to an extra 1000 studs at 50%. Now anyone withing 2000 studs of the CENTER of the planet brick get's pulled at HALF the normal speed. Then, at the 1000 stud mark, you fall at the normal speed
Jigsaw01
#46539403Monday, May 02, 2011 2:00 PM GMT

cool thank you for helping me!
anakinJCL
#46540864Monday, May 02, 2011 3:10 PM GMT

Helping you?
punkster1234567
#46540883Monday, May 02, 2011 3:11 PM GMT

This made my day. c: Support-ish. ~Punkster1234567, Creative lazor~
Alex592
#46541592Monday, May 02, 2011 3:54 PM GMT

Support-ish. -A
Notunknown99
#46541740Monday, May 02, 2011 4:02 PM GMT

We would also require remade basic building tools and a better Camera to support the player being 'upside down'. There would also be a problem in scripts with Position and planes (Unless whenever you are within a field your camera auto-corrects)
[rfa#hidefromsearch]
#46542840Monday, May 02, 2011 4:47 PM GMT

[rfa#hidefromsearch]
madattak
#46543326Monday, May 02, 2011 5:12 PM GMT

Good idea, but lagy and hard to make.
IForumI
#46544353Monday, May 02, 2011 5:59 PM GMT

50/50 :P
VolcanoINC
#46544443Monday, May 02, 2011 6:02 PM GMT

Easy, and scriptable. Don't suggest this!
anakinJCL
#46577357Tuesday, May 03, 2011 11:57 AM GMT

If it's "Scriptable" why has no one ever made a brick you can walk upside down on?
heyyouoverthere
#46577817Tuesday, May 03, 2011 12:37 PM GMT

SUPPORT 0oHeyyouoverthereo0
madattak
#46620800Wednesday, May 04, 2011 4:20 PM GMT

@anakin They have, but theres isnt realistic alterable gravity.
Notunknown99
#46620816Wednesday, May 04, 2011 4:21 PM GMT

@Volcano: Scriptable to walk upside down, but not having the camera EXPLODE while doing so is not.
Candymaniac
#46621119Wednesday, May 04, 2011 4:38 PM GMT

agreed with notunknown99. I support, but ROBLOX would need a new camera, and velocity updates, & fixes. OR, maybe even RE-DO them? Anyways, If they can do this with no further problems and with nothing to lose, I support!
Notunknown99
#46621178Wednesday, May 04, 2011 4:42 PM GMT

@Candy: I think they just need to DO them. You cant fix/redo what you dont have =P
anakinJCL
#46626659Wednesday, May 04, 2011 7:55 PM GMT

Anyone else have any opinions on the matter?
gunggung1
#46626817Wednesday, May 04, 2011 7:59 PM GMT

iSupportDis :D
gellick
#46626900Wednesday, May 04, 2011 8:01 PM GMT

Well theres the problem with floting players and such...

    of     1