FindPartOnRay update

Join Date: 2008-09-05
Post Count: 25360

#47968833Thursday, June 02, 2011 10:43 PM GMT

We currently have it where IgnoreDescendantInstance only accepts 1 instance, which is annoying. We COULD use tables, but that breaks current scripts. We could also use functions and check if it returns true. But why not those as well as an instance? Why not allow the second parameter to accept an instances, a table or a function?

junior118816

Join Date: 2009-10-13
Post Count: 12547

#47969117Thursday, June 02, 2011 10:48 PM GMT

Huh

Shobobo99

Join Date: 2008-12-30
Post Count: 5754

#47970033Thursday, June 02, 2011 11:01 PM GMT

Support. I really dislike how you if you want certain objects not to be detected most of the time you have to put all the parts in one model. I don't understand why Roblox made it Instances only.

Sourflour

Join Date: 2011-04-23
Post Count: 108

#47970280Thursday, June 02, 2011 11:05 PM GMT

What are you?

Shobobo99

Join Date: 2008-12-30
Post Count: 5754

#47970988Thursday, June 02, 2011 11:15 PM GMT

Why are there so many people who act so surprised and ignorant when they see a scripting suggestion?

Notunknown99

Join Date: 2008-09-05
Post Count: 25360

#47973177Thursday, June 02, 2011 11:51 PM GMT

Cos noone has the intellegence to try to learn.

Notunknown99

Join Date: 2008-09-05
Post Count: 25360

#47975377Friday, June 03, 2011 12:28 AM GMT

bymmi>?

Mk5Scorpion

Join Date: 2008-10-18
Post Count: 3177

#47975580Friday, June 03, 2011 12:31 AM GMT

No, more like they're too lazy to learn. I don't know what it means, but since the Ray part of FindPartOnRay has something to do with Raycast, I support. I got very little scripting knowledge.

Notunknown99

Join Date: 2008-09-05
Post Count: 25360

#47994826Friday, June 03, 2011 12:36 PM GMT

|3 [_] |\/| |*

Notunknown99

Join Date: 2008-09-05
Post Count: 25360

#48008470Friday, June 03, 2011 7:30 PM GMT

bUMP

Notunknown99

Join Date: 2008-09-05
Post Count: 25360

#48024951Friday, June 03, 2011 11:49 PM GMT

Byumio