of     2   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right

Auhrii
#48509272Sunday, June 12, 2011 5:28 PM GMT

Before you read this, bear in mind I WILL REPORT ANYONE WHO FLAMES, TROLLS, SPAMS, ETC. I was thinking of a staff that can capture another player for a short amount of time, say, a minute or so, but the capturer can't be captured. (This will prevent that glitch with the pokeballs where players don't respawn) Name: Amber Staff Description: Bugs get caught in it, why not ROBLOXians? Price: ~100R$ Genre: Melee Weapon Limited: No Rent: No BC Only: Yes TBC Only: No OBC Only: No The staff will look like a branch, but with a piece of amber stuck to the top. Reminder: I WILL REPORT SPAMMERS, FLAMERS, AND TROLLERS!
fdfxd
#48509368Sunday, June 12, 2011 5:30 PM GMT

Your in the wrong place. Flamming isn't reportable. PM ReeseMcBlox.
Recruitsoldier
#48509439Sunday, June 12, 2011 5:31 PM GMT

I stopped reading after your first sentence. I want to make sure that you know the difference between constructive criticism and flaming. If I say, "I dislike this idea," that's not flaming. If I say, "I dislike this idea, you suck," that's flaming. Now that I'm going to take the time to read this, let me see. A minute is a bit too long, because in online time minutes can feel really long. Shorten it to something like 15-30 seconds. Also increase the ROBUX from 100 R$ to 1,000 R$.
WaterMasterLuke
#48510818Sunday, June 12, 2011 5:58 PM GMT

BC only. You should 'bear in mind' That not everyone would want that and I don't like it... No support.
Auhrii
#48613144Tuesday, June 14, 2011 2:57 PM GMT

See what I mean? This is NOT constructive critizism, this is flaming. Go flame SONICTHEHEDGEHOGXX.
Recruitsoldier
#48613713Tuesday, June 14, 2011 3:11 PM GMT

In case you didn't notice, no one on this thread insulted you. Therefore, no one flamed you.
pizzaboy01
#48614311Tuesday, June 14, 2011 3:26 PM GMT

Flaming: GET DA HELLZ OUT NARBZ! Criticism: Make it for everyone, not all the people are BC dude.
deathman12e3
#48614737Tuesday, June 14, 2011 3:36 PM GMT

That woudl really look like a OBC gear, not BC. The colors are matching with OBC so OBC only. Support but one bad idea. :P
Auhrii
#48674995Wednesday, June 15, 2011 5:07 PM GMT

Guys who say it isn't flaming, it doesn't matter to you. NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS.
TwiIightSparkle
#48675302Wednesday, June 15, 2011 5:13 PM GMT

[ Content Deleted ]
deathman12e3
#48703225Thursday, June 16, 2011 12:17 AM GMT

It is our business, you started the thread. If you don't want people posting just email roblox.
Auhrii
#52028071Thursday, August 04, 2011 8:55 AM GMT

How does THAT logic work? All because I started the thread means something I don't want is someone else's business? You've been on the computer too much.
deltav
#52028516Thursday, August 04, 2011 9:15 AM GMT

One minute is NOT a short amount of time, 4 seconds is. And 100R$ is NOT a reasonable price, 1000R$ is the minimum for a ranged movement-halting projectile gear. I like the idea, though it's just a Freeze Ray with a different mesh and colors.
Auhrii
#52028622Thursday, August 04, 2011 9:18 AM GMT

Not quite. I have a few other ideas for it. I'm also scrapping some old ideas. I think 100R$ IS reasonable, because people on Roblox want to have more gear, don't they? I was thinking maybe to make it a bit weaker. Like... y'know... stops movement for a shorter amount of time?
deltav
#52028636Thursday, August 04, 2011 9:18 AM GMT

Oh, and Copy-Pasted from Wikipedia: 'Flaming, also known as bashing, is hostile and insulting interaction between Internet users. It is frequently the result of the discussion of heated real-world issues such as politics, sports, religion, and philosophy, or of issues that polarise subpopulations, but can also be provoked by seemingly trivial differences.' Well, there you go.
Auhrii
#52028671Thursday, August 04, 2011 9:19 AM GMT

Wikipedia is community-powered, and most of the community has forgotten the meaning of flaming.
deltav
#52028728Thursday, August 04, 2011 9:21 AM GMT

@Kieran 100R$ is not reasonable at all, as 100R$ is mainly the price for weaker gear items. What is, according to you, the definition of flaming?
Auhrii
#52028854Thursday, August 04, 2011 9:25 AM GMT

I already stated the definition of flaming. Read next time. Anyway, I ALSO said the gear WILL BE WEAKER THAN FIRST PLANNED. Like I said, READ FIRST.
Auhrii
#52028969Thursday, August 04, 2011 9:29 AM GMT

Now. This was an old thread I wanted to end, but you had to reignite the fire, didn't you? Just. Drop it.
deltav
#52029235Thursday, August 04, 2011 9:38 AM GMT

'See what I mean? This is NOT constructive critizism, this is flaming' If this is your definition, then you are terribly wrong. And it doesn't matter that you are going to make it weaker. 100R$ is NOT the price for such gear, and I get the feeling that you only chose that price because you want the gear.
Auhrii
#52029290Thursday, August 04, 2011 9:40 AM GMT

Read again. That is not a definition, that is a statement.
Auhrii
#52029322Thursday, August 04, 2011 9:40 AM GMT

Anyway, I think you'll find I put 100R$ MINIMUM. If minimum is NOT there, blame my keyboard.
Auhrii
#52029367Thursday, August 04, 2011 9:42 AM GMT

Now drop it, or i'll ship you off to the Aperture Science Computer Aided Enrichment Centre.
deltav
#52029372Thursday, August 04, 2011 9:42 AM GMT

Where is your definition then? I didn't see it anywhere.
Auhrii
#52029425Thursday, August 04, 2011 9:44 AM GMT

Keep reading until you find it. And don't post back. I want this thread to end. I have done for a while.

    of     2   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right