of     3   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right

Slayerman410
#55987477Friday, October 07, 2011 11:57 PM GMT

I am personally against it. How but you all?
Carbonwinglabs
#55989441Saturday, October 08, 2011 12:25 AM GMT

You are against millions of new jobs in usa? Plutocrat. We will just ship all our oil to germany k? You can buy from iran.
Slayerman410
#55989571Saturday, October 08, 2011 12:27 AM GMT

I would like if it was American. I support Drill here, Drill now not Drill in Canada, Not Iran. Besides I am free marketer, go oil, go green energy.
Slayerman410
#55989625Saturday, October 08, 2011 12:27 AM GMT

Also the company says all several thousand jobs would be created for construction, about 10% of that would remain after completion for operation. That's many jobs.
Slayerman410
#55989672Saturday, October 08, 2011 12:28 AM GMT

*that's not many jobs
twigs187
#55991374Saturday, October 08, 2011 12:52 AM GMT

[ Content Deleted ]
Slayerman410
#55991423Saturday, October 08, 2011 12:53 AM GMT

My point is made even further.
Carbonwinglabs
#55991502Saturday, October 08, 2011 12:54 AM GMT

You did not make that point. Meh, we cna sell oil elsewhere, hope you enjoy buying from Iran and Venezuela
Warrab
#55991618Saturday, October 08, 2011 12:56 AM GMT

There is nothing wrong with buying oil from Canada. Canada is okay. Canada's an ally.
Slayerman410
#55991683Saturday, October 08, 2011 12:56 AM GMT

No we will enjoy getting oil from Texas, Alaska and our shores.
Slayerman410
#55991798Saturday, October 08, 2011 12:58 AM GMT

But it is Canadian. That's the problem. I want American oil/energy and I want it now. I WANT IT MADE IN AMERICA!!! MaAF_3WMJGM&ob=av2e
Warrab
#55991803Saturday, October 08, 2011 12:58 AM GMT

Energy independence is a concern because of the significant portion of it that comes from nations that are, to put it lightly, questionable, like Saudi Arabia. Canada is no such threat. Canada is a friend.
twigs187
#55991850Saturday, October 08, 2011 12:59 AM GMT

[ Content Deleted ]
Warrab
#55991951Saturday, October 08, 2011 1:00 AM GMT

There is no threat of that, twigs. Leaks are easy to seal above land. The Deep Water Horizon was a problem because it was exactly that, deep water.
Slayerman410
#55992042Saturday, October 08, 2011 1:02 AM GMT

But it gives them a stake in us. Which is bad. You are justifying things by saying they are our friends so its okay. This is an extreme example but your logic is like I will Anthony my social security and bank account numbers because I have known him for 'x' amount of years. Canada will use this against. We cannot preach energy independance and then not follow through as soon as we are thrown with something closer but not it. That's disingenious and unfair. We must have complete energy independance if we are to remain economic hegemon.
Warrab
#55992491Saturday, October 08, 2011 1:08 AM GMT

Canada is inseparable from us, Jericho. Both geographically and economically. They always will have a stake in us, This is an extreme example but your logic is like I will Anthony my social security and bank account numbers because I have known him for 'x' amount of years. Canada will use this against. ___ Yes, that's a very extreme example. We already buy oil from Canada, and they don't use it against us. Issue solved. We cannot preach energy independance and then not follow through as soon as we are thrown with something closer but not it. That's disingenious and unfair. We must have complete energy independance if we are to remain economic hegemon. ___ Then I don't support energy independence. Woopwoopwoop.
twigs187
#55992669Saturday, October 08, 2011 1:11 AM GMT

[ Content Deleted ]
Slayerman410
#55992707Saturday, October 08, 2011 1:12 AM GMT

Yes but we don't have miles upon miles of pipeline running through our country owned by Canada. I never said we weren't, and I am not preaching independance from Canadian markets, I am promoting a dominant American position in Americo-Canadian trade relations.
Warrab
#55992827Saturday, October 08, 2011 1:14 AM GMT

Can't the pipeline go around the aquifer? Is it that difficult? Yes but we don't have miles upon miles of pipeline running through our country owned by Canada. ___ Who cares? I never said we weren't, and I am not preaching independance from Canadian markets, I am promoting a dominant American position in Americo-Canadian trade relations. ___ A pipeline isn't a surrendur of autonomy, jericho.
Carbonwinglabs
#55992928Saturday, October 08, 2011 1:16 AM GMT

>But it gives them a stake in us. Which is bad. >Energy independance a >We must have complete energy independance if we are to remain economic hegemony. WTF are you talking about you communist? Get a stake in you? It's freed trade what america stands for, how dare are you promote the socialist hoax of Autarky! Energy independence is no more then a socialist brainwashing tool from the left, who wish to turn usa towards slave labour! THe invisible hand will decide where or not we purchase oil from Canada and it has decided, any government that interferes with an important free market practice is a communist government and should be overthrown via second amendment.
Slayerman410
#55993244Saturday, October 08, 2011 1:20 AM GMT

Who cares? ____ Your example is useless because your making an incomparable in whole comparrison with a yet to happen thing and something that is but in different in set up completely. A pipeline isn't a surrendur of autonomy, jericho. ______ Give them an inch, they'll take a mile. All it takes is one form of submission and they can pull the rug out from under your feet. NERDALERT Star wars analogy to illustrate my point above. It's like Palpatine allowing the release of the death star II plans thinking his naval trap and garrisons would just lure them in and defeat them, instead the rebels own them and why? Plans releasement, one tiny submission ment decline and eventual defeat of a 23 year old superpower.
Warrab
#55993305Saturday, October 08, 2011 1:21 AM GMT

Ugh. You sound like Werton. You think every country is out to get us.
Slayerman410
#55993336Saturday, October 08, 2011 1:21 AM GMT

>But it gives them a stake in us. Which is bad. >Energy independance a >We must have complete energy independance if we are to remain economic hegemony. WTF are you talking about you communist? Get a stake in you? It's freed trade what america stands for, how dare are you promote the socialist hoax of Autarky! _____ 6/10 Energy independence is no more then a socialist brainwashing tool from the left, who wish to turn usa towards slave labour! ______ 3/10 THe invisible hand will decide where or not we purchase oil from Canada and it has decided, any government that interferes with an important free market practice is a communist government and should be overthrown via second amendment. ______ 4/10
Slayerman410
#55993483Saturday, October 08, 2011 1:24 AM GMT

Ugh. You sound like Werton. You think every country is out to get us. ____ 3/10 I believe that every nation is self interested and has one desire. To be number one. That does not mean I think every nation is out to get us. I believe that core principle if correct can be used to our favor as long as well play the pieces right.
Carbonwinglabs
#55993594Saturday, October 08, 2011 1:26 AM GMT

>every nation is self interested and has one desire. To be number one. I wish that were canada, we have such great potnetial, but we sit on it and do nothing.

    of     3   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right