Matt Barkley Should of won the Heissman

DrSnoopster

Join Date: 2011-11-23
Post Count: 628

#59202342Wednesday, December 07, 2011 1:24 AM GMT

But since he is on a underrated USC Team, he can't win it. >.> scammmmmmm

MuffinPimpinisbanned

Join Date: 2011-07-27
Post Count: 1878

#59202504Wednesday, December 07, 2011 1:26 AM GMT

*overrated And no he shouldn't of. He is not better than: RG3 Richardson Luck Ball Matthieu Moore James (LaMicheal)

speckledorfthesecond

Join Date: 2011-08-02
Post Count: 1916

#59203680Wednesday, December 07, 2011 1:40 AM GMT

@muffin you're kidding right for a USC team that wasn't even supposed to crack the AP rankings this year, they were excellent they upset oregon at oregon lost to stanford on a lucky play, and they would've won if time didn't expire they killed UCLA, who managed to come within 18 points of oregon in the championship they would've won the pac 12 this year, and been in the rose bowl, and everyone agrees that barkley is the biggest heisman snub they aren't giving it to any USC player because of the ban

MuffinPimpinisbanned

Join Date: 2011-07-27
Post Count: 1878

#59209990Wednesday, December 07, 2011 3:01 AM GMT

@Speckle UCLA is a joke Tells you the expectations of his team when they are not supposed to crack the AP Rankings Stanford>USC Upset is a key word. Just cause you upset someone doesn't make you good, Texas Tech upset Oklahoma @ Oklahoma. Does that mean their QB should be a heisman contender?