ItsFuturJoin Date: 2009-11-08
Post Count: 4383 |
Put em' here people...
All of them....
All ideas will be considered.
- Darwin12 |
|
LewnaJoin Date: 2010-09-10
Post Count: 315 |
post ideas and you get tix |
|
dralionJoin Date: 2008-04-12
Post Count: 17440 |
A restaurant on the top floor.
A deluxe suite near the top floor.
A pool area built into the side of a small mountain surrounding the hotel. |
|
|
This thread is going into the darwin awards... |
|
|
An exhibition that proves evolution is correct. |
|
LewnaJoin Date: 2010-09-10
Post Count: 315 |
Look the post number has 777 in it! |
|
|
There isn't any scientific support for evolution. =/ |
|
dralionJoin Date: 2008-04-12
Post Count: 17440 |
let zee flame war begin! |
|
|
There isn't any scientific support for evolution. =/
_______________
I apologize. I should have listed some. My bad.
- Scientists were able to create a new species of fly within 50 generations. I understand that microevolution is easily performed and is actually a popular high school science experiment.
- In the 1960s, experiments were performed that successfully created amino acids out of primordial soup and "lightning"
- Evolution of birds from reptiles is well documented in the fossil record.
- Evolution of the hominid is easily demonstrated. It has been genetically proven that apes and humans share a common ancestor.
- Darwin's finches. :P
- Etc. |
|
|
ok i suggest realistic c framed elevators, landing pads for helicopters and starships and i also suggest you have multiple buildings with pools, hottubs and other luxuries |
|
|
um, deluxe suits with a pool, steam room, and a dar-room with everything darwin loves, has accomplished, or anything like that. for reg room, VIDEO GAMES!! also, i suggest roll-12 is located there so we can have a place to stay for launch. |
|
|
-Animals can adapt, but evolution is an extreme.
-The fossil record has no support for evolution whatsoever as there aren't creatures that are in between evolving from Animal A to Animal B. And most of the discovered transitional sapiens were proved to simply be diseased people.
-The chance of evolution being correct is the same as a tornado creating a perfectly genuine Bugatti Veyron scratchless.
-Why don't I see half people half apes walking around?
-If people created the evolution effect, the whole area would have to be 100% cell free, and there's very little chance that the area was. |
|
|
Also, reptiles may have had feathers, but does it seem practical at all that a velociraptor evolved into a sparrow? It seems like evolution devolved. |
|
|
-Animals can adapt, but evolution is an extreme
__________________________
You misunderstand evolution, actually.
-The fossil record has no support for evolution whatsoever as there aren't creatures that are in between evolving from Animal A to Animal B. And most of the discovered transitional sapiens were proved to simply be diseased people.
__________________________
Besides Florensis, there are no examples of that (and Florensis is still debated). There are many intermediate steps between apes and humans, all are genetically and anatomically different species from Sapiens.
-The chance of evolution being correct is the same as a tornado creating a perfectly genuine Bugatti Veyron scratchless.
__________________________
Umm ok.
-Why don't I see half people half apes walking around?
___________________________
They used to, and then they died out. Species don't exist forever, good sir.
-If people created the evolution effect, the whole area would have to be 100% cell free, and there's very little chance that the area was.
____________________________
You don't understand the experiment. |
|
|
Also, reptiles may have had feathers, but does it seem practical at all that a velociraptor evolved into a sparrow? It seems like evolution devolved.
_________________________
Planets favor different conditions at different times. Most megafauna has evolved into smaller forms. You must understand the conditions of the time. |
|
|
I get your point, but my main point is against transitional fossils which are practically nonexistent. Anyways, if evolution is true, birds should be slowly evolving filters in their lungs to keep them from breathing in pollution and other things. Also, evolution is based on natural selection, and if humans are doing so well, why are there any apes at all? The half apes half humans probably wouldn't have died out if both species still exist. |
|
|
but my main point is against transitional fossils which are practically nonexistent
___________________________________
Source.
Anyways, if evolution is true, birds should be slowly evolving filters in their lungs to keep them from breathing in pollution and other things.
_____________________________________
If it was necessary for survival (which it apparently isn't) then they would be. However, bacteria evolve to resist drugs (not just adaptation, new species are created because of it) which is why you get a new flu shot every year.
Also, evolution is based on natural selection, and if humans are doing so well, why are there any apes at all?
____________________________________
Because apes apparently have qualities favorable to their continued survival, although apes have evolved as well from our common ancestor. They aren't the same primates we evolved from.
The half apes half humans probably wouldn't have died out if both species still exist.
___________________________________
That only proves that the middle-of-the-road wasn't the right one. :P |
|
|
Darn it! I don't have enough creationism paraphernalia. =P Anyways, atheism IS biased over religion because of American cultural belief. |
|
|
Could you explain that further? |
|
|
Since atheism is popular in North America, it's biased over creationism due to cultural belief that if something doesn't involve a deity, it's closer to fact. |
|
|
A fair argument, actually, except for the part where evolution has much wider factual support than creationism.
Also, atheism isn't that popular in North America. Most Christians everywhere else in the world currently are "accomodationists"- Christians that accept evolution. The current survival of creationism is largely centered in America, one of the only locations of Christian fundamentalism. |
|
|
Evolution isn't very compatible with Christianity, but if it was true, I'd probably believe it. I just don't think it's a very good theory. |
|
|
Science is very compatible with Christianity, if you accept that the Bible isn't always correct. |
|
|
Science is compatible with Christianity, though not very much in the area of evolution. I don't think of the Bible as a book sent down from heaven, just a historical record. Parts of it may be wrong because it has hundreds of authors, but the majority of it is fact. |
|
|
Yes, especially the Old Testament.
And the way we should have slaves and many wives and beat them all.
And the part where we follow a zombie.
That's my favorite. |
|