|
Insert Service.
For those who don't know, Insert Service was the functionality that allowed models, decals, etc. posted on roblox but not inserted into the game to be spawned in either via the old insert tool or a script. Due to a small group of exploiters that were rather unsuccessful (9 out of 11 of them got IP Banned, and the last 2 went idle) Insert Service was removed by the ROBLOX team, affecting many rule-abiding players.
Exploitation, being rarer nowadays, could be the least of worries if Insert Service is returned. But, alas, one bad apple spoils the whole bunch.
Discuss. |
|
|
ProjekttJoin Date: 2012-04-05
Post Count: 86 |
You posted this yesterday ._.
Support, yes.
-ttkejorP |
|
|
Isn't it that thing that allows you to insert free models, free decals, your decals, or your own models onto Roblox? If so, you might as well want to look closer, it's still on Roblox studio. |
|
papeyJoin Date: 2008-09-18
Post Count: 7424 |
@deathshiva
What if you want to do it ONLINE, IN A GAME? |
|
|
@Papey If it has anything to do with Solo mode, all you have to do is save it and edit it. Otherwise the "Insert" tab in the old Roblox gui was deleted due to easy Exploits. |
|
|
Support! I'm making Crossroad Canyon and I want to do with game tool, copy, delete, resize, and surface tool (Otherwise, build mode) but to insert models easily with the insert tool. |
|
jacob726Join Date: 2008-07-24
Post Count: 10732 |
Just to give this tool a problem, and see how you overcome it: How about those scripts that ban the entire server, if the one who inserted it leaves/gets killed/gets banned?
I, personally, hate those. They are annoying, to the point that I typed that "They" with 2 Y's and had to go back and delete it. =P
|
|
papeyJoin Date: 2008-09-18
Post Count: 7424 |
@deathshiva
Not anything to do with solo.
Just simple online. As in, with other players.
Like on the "insert wars" places. |
|
|
@Papey That never existed then. Insert wars was based off of a tool that can be automatically given if you just stick that one tool into the Roblox backpack. |
|
|
Do you know how much exploiting this will cause?
It's REALLY bad already!
No support. |
|
|
deathshiva, "That one roblox tool" is the exact tool I was referring to (which was broken.)
This feature might also be useful for people who play with friends in personal servers. |
|
Remmy1337Join Date: 2011-08-23
Post Count: 13 |
Sounds good i guess. |
|
|
|
"You posted this yesterday*
*Nicolas Cage face*
You don't say?
(I reposted because, in truth, it was never seen by the majority of people in the S&I forum) |
|
|
rhyjJoin Date: 2009-06-25
Post Count: 691 |
I don't understand this very much... |
|
blockooJoin Date: 2007-11-08
Post Count: 17202 |
InsertService still exists, but it's restricted to help stop exploits. |
|
|
Just open Roblox Studio and press build or studio.
Insert service is at the top right corner.
Walla! |
|
|
SUPPORT
Orbs and inserts dont work now making Insert Wars games pretty obselete. |
|
blockooJoin Date: 2007-11-08
Post Count: 17202 |
I'm glad Insert Wars places are gone. They're completely unoriginal. |
|
cobalt10Join Date: 2008-07-21
Post Count: 7371 |
"It is better and more satisfactory to acquit a thousand guilty persons than to put a single innocent one to death."
Just because a few idiots found a way to screw over with ROBLOX's security policies in-game, doesn't mean the particular end product of it should be removed. If someone went into a game and inserted a single brick, and if ROBLOX followed the same logic they did in this case, then ROBLOX would have removed bricks. Instead of removing what they used AFTER they exploited, maybe they should simply increase security in the program so the exploit is patched? Wouldn't that be so much easier?
~Truth is an unpopular subject, because it is unquestionably correct.~ |
|
jacob726Join Date: 2008-07-24
Post Count: 10732 |
Not easier, But more appeasing to the community. |
|
blockooJoin Date: 2007-11-08
Post Count: 17202 |
"It is better and more satisfactory to acquit a thousand guilty persons than to put a single innocent one to death."
Do not agree |
|
|
Cobalt, my good man, you have detailed exactly what I was aiming to state. |
|