thepit45Join Date: 2011-01-19
Post Count: 290 |
By that definition, any country to go to war ever are terrorists. It should be redefined to the use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aim by an aggressor. |
|
CorridanJoin Date: 2012-11-23
Post Count: 7344 |
What about religious aim? |
|
thepit45Join Date: 2011-01-19
Post Count: 290 |
I think that counts under political. |
|
|
No as long as the offending country is a NATION it is not a terrorist, it represents a threat to a separate nation and not to the law and to the public.
Once one of these nations occupies the other, the former enemy nation is now a threat to the law and to the public. So they become terrorists. |
|
gamert7Join Date: 2008-11-18
Post Count: 4986 |
^What if i told you that these terrorist are just tired of our occupation in the Arabian peninsula? |
|
|
What if I told you Dan is Arab
~Falafel Monster of Ajman the creature that tormented the dreams of every Arab child growing up in the 90's.~ |
|
gamert7Join Date: 2008-11-18
Post Count: 4986 |
Personally, it makes no difference to me if he is Arab or American. |
|
|
The term "Terrorist" isn't really a bad term. Also who exactly are you talking about? |
|
|
Does it make a difference if I"m both XD
Dual-citizenship, don't ask me how i got it. I honestly don't know. |
|
|
So the crusaders were terrorists? |
|
|
|
"t should be redefined to the use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aim by an aggressor."
But then all governments would be called terrorists.
The way powerful people use it is far too broad. Anyone who dares oppose the US occupation of the middle east is called a terrorist and then it's easier for them to get away with drone striking them to death. |
|
|
^What if i told you that these terrorist are just tired of our occupation in the Arabian peninsula?
----------------
Thats hilarious. |
|
|
By that I mean Iraq and Afghanistan arent on the Arabian Peninsula. |
|
gamert7Join Date: 2008-11-18
Post Count: 4986 |
Really? Because, who is Al Quadia? Remember they were our old allies the Mujahideen along with Osama Bin Laden.
We funded them. Our CIA trained them to get rid of the Soviet occupying force.
They didn't mind or hate us then. But, simultaneously after Russia left we poured our military bases in and have been militarily involved since then. Do they not hate us for the same reason they hated the Soviets back in the 1980s?
After the soviets left the never had any terrorist attacks by the Mujahideen. Why? Because, they just wanted their freedom.
The Mujahideen broke apart after the war but, after years of foreign occupation they decided they had enough and that was 9/11 of course with some essential planning required.
We launched a preemptive strike on them so who has the moral high ground? People fighting for their freedom or foreign invaders? The revolutionary war shows us the answer and it should be obvious.
Of course 9/11 could be the same thing that was planned to take us into war as was the lie about The Golf of Tunkin. There is no chance for us to win this war as there was no chance to win the Vietnam war.
We were humiliated for our actions as the freedom fighters of North Vietnam defeated us whilst fighting for their liberties.
If fighting for your freedoms is terrorism then I guess our founding fathers were terrorist as well.
If you guys honestly think they hate us because, we are free then you are living in a dream land. |
|
|
@Castro
Iraq is in the Arabian Peninsular as it is an Arab country.
~Falafel Monster of Ajman the creature that tormented the dreams of every Arab child growing up in the 90's.~ |
|
|