|
The floodcheck is useful.
The floodcheck prevents spam.
I am in full support of the floodcheck.
But there come's a time when there is no use for it.
## Proposition: ##
I am proposing people who hit 5,000 forum posts, and have not been reported in a reasonable amount for spam, profanity etc on the FORUMS alone, can have a *reduced* floodcheck, or that it is taken away *completely*.
Why I ask this?
I now have racked up over 12,000 forum posts, and I now find myself participating in many different subsection forums, (Mainly Clans and Guilds, Let's Make a Deal and Suggestions and Ideas), and when I find that I have to wait numerous seconds just to make a new post, I find myself getting bored waiting, and slowly drift back off the forums. But because I have made most my friends using the forums, (but also my clan, join flag!!), I always come back. There is always something to talk about, always a time to socialise.
I am hoping something can be done, people who are regally active on the forums, are mature, and don't just spam for posts, why can they deserve a bonus to make their forum time better?
The lonely sentinel.. |
|
3kunJoin Date: 2012-05-07 Post Count: 4169 |
People could spam easily. |
|
AenarJoin Date: 2012-07-16 Post Count: 3067 |
Support.
The Vakster |
|
|
What I'm saying, is that it is not for the people who do spam a lot.
Don't you read?
The lonely sentinel.. |
|
surge905Join Date: 2010-12-04 Post Count: 3118 |
## SUPPORT! ##
----------
[ Content Deleted ] |
|
|
le boomp
The lonely sentinel.. |
|
2kmoreJoin Date: 2009-04-25 Post Count: 26218 |
Either they get rid of it or shorten the time.
SUPPORT |
|
t_oastJoin Date: 2011-05-26 Post Count: 14959 |
support but ppl will spam easily
less time 4 floodcheck |
|
EncreylJoin Date: 2012-03-16 Post Count: 558 |
Support, because its 5k posts. Not many spam alts reach that. |
|
UlrondJoin Date: 2011-06-23 Post Count: 11962 |
Full Support. |
|
OkudzhavaJoin Date: 2009-05-29 Post Count: 2514 |
Read the title, need no more.
No Support. |
|
OkudzhavaJoin Date: 2009-05-29 Post Count: 2514 |
Okay I read it.. sorry..
75% Support. |
|
|
bump
The lonely sentinel.. |
|
WhosoeverJoin Date: 2012-02-24 Post Count: 7660 |
As people are typing these suggestions, I suggest that you close your eyes so you you won't have to see the spam. |
|
|
Huh?
The lonely sentinel.. |
|
|
boomp
The lonely sentinel.. |
|
|
|
omg bump
The lonely sentinel.. |
|
BomaticJoin Date: 2012-01-01 Post Count: 20931 |
ya111 |
|
MeldroidJoin Date: 2010-02-12 Post Count: 1043 |
The floodcheck time really isn't that long. No support. |
|
|
Melmilly, it is 30 seconds.
When you play such an active part in the forums as I do, it really bugs me.
The lonely sentinel.. |
|
|
boomp
The lonely sentinel.. |
|
|
Do not support.
Most people, who actually take the time to read through the forums, and decide on what they want to say, rather than doing one-word useless posts, do not have a problem with this floodcheck. Why should time be put into trying to change the forum's code to accommodate you being a little annoyed that you have to wait...what? Half a minute to post? Doing this can be VERY hard to do without breaking the code that's already there, and it's only to save you a minuscule amount of time.
I also don't see why it's that much of a problem anyways. I frequent another forum, and have the most amount of posts there (40k after about a year of paragraph posts), and have NEVER had a huge problem with the floodcheck. I bet, if you ask people who actually want to post content that is worthwhile on here, they wouldn't have much of a problem with the floodcheck either. |
|
|
Black Luigi, as I was saying, I play a role in many subsections of the forum, and as I am a fast typer, I can sometimes write a good reply, then need to spend 15 seconds just waiting to post it, while I am also wanting to snag some deals on LMaD.
The lonely sentinel.. |
|
|
Spend time on the forums. Read through the entire threads or think more about your post. No support. I don't care if it is for 5k+ posters, if you need to say something every 30 seconds you don't really care for the subject. |
|