"lol the war score was 57-0 why have a FB with JC?"

Join Date: 2010-10-23
Post Count: 10926

#94575799Thursday, April 11, 2013 10:10 PM GMT

because the war agreement was raids don't matter and there would be a FB.

Join Date: 2011-03-24
Post Count: 4180

#94576047Thursday, April 11, 2013 10:12 PM GMT

lol so even if it was a war agreement it doesnt mean it cant be a stupid as hell agreement the logic in that statement contains so many flaws but oh well seems we degenerated

assassin_lord

Join Date: 2010-10-23
Post Count: 10926

#94576191Thursday, April 11, 2013 10:14 PM GMT

my logic has no flaws, it was the agreement. >Fact

Atomicblast180

Join Date: 2011-03-24
Post Count: 4180

#94576268Thursday, April 11, 2013 10:14 PM GMT

lol ur stupid assasino because nobody goes without their logic not being flawed >fact i meant the agreement had flaws

u6v

Join Date: 2010-10-19
Post Count: 12364

#94576476Thursday, April 11, 2013 10:16 PM GMT

ragers

2unknown2

Join Date: 2011-10-30
Post Count: 9351

#94576568Thursday, April 11, 2013 10:17 PM GMT

lol

AlexR1212

Join Date: 2011-12-22
Post Count: 14288

#94576661Thursday, April 11, 2013 10:18 PM GMT

I actually agree with Assassin. The original agreement was that raids don't matter. JC will get destroyed in a FB, but that was the agreement.