of     4   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right

sassle12
#98316966Tuesday, May 21, 2013 5:26 AM GMT

Straight away I am going to say that this is the new forcefield. Ok so the forcefield when you spawn has this blue sphere around you. If you remove that you have a white light that I'll call a shine effect. This shine effect should be able to be taken by normal users in the properties where you find pointlight,spotlight,fire,etc. This forcefield effect would be easy to implement and could have properties of its own. It will have to be parented to a part. Movement speed: Angle of movement: Colour: Size: So far that''s all I can think of but this called be amazing. Certain games could use this in crystals, lobbies, bosses, etc. So please support this idea and if you do not support, re read this whole post and then say exactly WHY. Q&A WNTS Heck no. This is pointless. No it is a useful tool, dynamic lighting wasn't needed. I like the old forcefield. Me too.
Ulrond
#98317175Tuesday, May 21, 2013 5:32 AM GMT

Support.
UnBuild
#98317627Tuesday, May 21, 2013 5:45 AM GMT

Breaking news The force field sparkle is a normal white sparkle, but with more then one in it I edited what my sparkles look like, theforce field sparkles changed as well
Udoxas
#98317654Tuesday, May 21, 2013 5:46 AM GMT

I might use this in my game once. Support! ~Come to the dark side, we have cookies~
sassle12
#98334978Tuesday, May 21, 2013 3:15 PM GMT

UnBuild. It is not the regular sparkle. Do you know what the regular sparkle looks like? (You probably do). You can't edit the forcefield sparkle and the only way to get it is to use the forcefield. Why isn't neccessary. Thanks surfking. Thanks lego.
UnBuild
#98336474Tuesday, May 21, 2013 3:46 PM GMT

Open up your LocalAppData > Roblox > Versions > Find the newest version that ROBLOX uses atm Go to Content > and (I believe its in textures, on iPhone cant check) Find the picture of a sparkle, now make the full image black or gray Save and look at forcefields
sassle12
#98339143Tuesday, May 21, 2013 4:36 PM GMT

Its a picture, not an animation.
UnBuild
#98339679Tuesday, May 21, 2013 4:45 PM GMT

I know its a freaking picture thats what I said.
sassle12
#98341883Tuesday, May 21, 2013 5:26 PM GMT

Exactly. The effect im talking about is an animation... And no need to say freaking, your not 6 right?
UnBuild
#98342082Tuesday, May 21, 2013 5:29 PM GMT

No its not. Its a picture that rotates, like the sparkles.
sassle12
#98346994Tuesday, May 21, 2013 6:53 PM GMT

Its not just one picture, its lots. Besides you cant change the size without the properties whilst still having great quality. You said it's like the sparkles. So it should be accessible to all users. You can't change the colour with your reply either. There are lots of properties that can't be changed with the way you said. Besides roblox obviously has an image for this forcefield sparkle. So it shouldn't be too hard to implement. Just change to support, it's scriptable to a poor standard.
UnBuild
#98348059Tuesday, May 21, 2013 7:08 PM GMT

You clearly don't know what you are talking about. I know for a FACT that it is one image, as I have mine edited to be only a square. I only change ONE image.
sassle12
#98409413Wednesday, May 22, 2013 5:05 AM GMT

Your missing the point. It is only 1 image. You can't change most of it's properties to a good standard. It is not just one image. There is a sparkle that rotates, and a sort of "white rain" effect. Now I think we can agree that this flame war on my forum should be stopped. If you put this in the place where you can get spotlight,pointlight,part,etc. Properties it could have, Colour Size Speed of rotation Direction of rotation Transparency. Now I realised a flaw with having 1 image, you can see the forcefield sparkle from all angles, and it's always the same, like the sparkles. I clearly don't know what I'm talking about but your missing what I said before, it needs to be to a good standard.
Demetreous
#98410141Wednesday, May 22, 2013 5:21 AM GMT

I miss the old forcefield, q.q. But when I went to a game that has a similar forcefield to it, I was like hmm... why did I miss this again? Maybe they removed it because it was giving people seizures... e.e But yeah, support! ~Deme
UnBuild
#98411721Wednesday, May 22, 2013 5:58 AM GMT

"Stop the flame war" What flame war
jacob726
#98411872Wednesday, May 22, 2013 6:03 AM GMT

It's a single core image, duplicated multiple times of differing sizes, yes? But, why does that matter? Wasn't this a suggestion to allow it to be added to a part in-game to act as a particle effect like Fire or Smoke? Or have I misread somewhere? ~>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QzuaZR52cXo<~
sassle12
#98412078Wednesday, May 22, 2013 6:08 AM GMT

^ Exactly
WinnerLukario
#98412330Wednesday, May 22, 2013 6:16 AM GMT

No support, the new forcefield looks freaking hideous and it's only blue and you know how much I HATE the colour blue, so rainbow ffs are better and balls.... no offense but they are [ Sorry, this account has been banned for swearing ]
UnBuild
#98412332Wednesday, May 22, 2013 6:16 AM GMT

One of the first things I said was its just more then one sparkle Put 10 white sparkles in a brick
sassle12
#98412593Wednesday, May 22, 2013 6:25 AM GMT

@Winner, I'm not talking about the forcefield at all. Your just saying that you don't like the new one so you don't support. That's not a valid reason so I'm changing it to a support. @Unbuild, your completely missing the point! IT'S NOT MORE THAN ONE SPARKLE IT IS A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT EFFECT! So I changed that to a support as well, until you can make another reason which is idiotic. I am starting to get annoyed, oh wait your name is Unbuild of course you don't want this implemented.
UnBuild
#98412674Wednesday, May 22, 2013 6:28 AM GMT

You are being imuture, Im done talking to you. Good bye.
UnBuild
#98412728Wednesday, May 22, 2013 6:30 AM GMT

I will say this though, you can not just count us as a support because you don't like our reasons.
sassle12
#98412741Wednesday, May 22, 2013 6:30 AM GMT

^ Funny cause your saying I don't know what I'm talking about even though your from 2013 and I'm from 2009.
michaelaqz4
#98412832Wednesday, May 22, 2013 6:33 AM GMT

Okay I said I was done with this thread. I lied. Im going to still point out the stupid imuture things you say 1.UnBuild is clearly a name snipe 2.Join date doesnt matter 3.If it did matter <----
jetfire227
#98412875Wednesday, May 22, 2013 6:35 AM GMT

no

    of     4   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right