|
"they suck so im not going to listen"
"they suck"? Such a naive and idiotic statement is very concerning.
Culture Club is essentially superior to any of the aforementioned groups.
Only your own idiocy prevents you from indulging in such domineering musical bliss. |
|
|
Ah, that is only the beginning.
Account deletion is a sort of game.
The more terminations obtained, the greater the tally-marks earned.
It is respected immensely on the ROBLOX forum. |
|
|
5
∑(1)
1
Ah, there you go. |
|
|
|
Five is the answer, as five is quite literally the mid integer of one and ten. |
|
|
Unfortunately, the NSA is monitoring statement of this type.
I am hoping that you live outside the organization's jurisdiction. |
|
|
An imbecile using the Internet. Much like users such as "SongOfSwords", "shadow07", "ClaraTheDragonBorn", "wizardfireugly", et cetera. |
|
|
Ah, my previous inquiry does not matter.
I will adapt my Sigma algorithm based on the English alphabet.
F: P --> L
26
∑(F(p))
p=1
Theoretically, the above should "sum" all of the output letters together within the formation {A,B,C,...,Z}. |
|
|
You may find it entertaining to recognize that elementary Sigma notation can validly accomplish this in a single post. |
|
|
"@Anon Whet?"
Sigma notation is a method to calculate the total sum of all terms(Or numbers) within a given sequence.
This is the representation that I was referring to:
7
∑(1)
p=1
The above sequence would begin at the minimum pth term, consecutively adding 1 to itself until the pth term is equivalent to the 7th term, which is the maximum term.
(1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1) = (7)
It is irrelevant anyway, I suppose.
Anyway, returning to the thread:
1 |
|
|
"Replaced" is merely a subordinate of Heartstrings.
A pitiful imbecile.
It is a repulsive sight, yes? |
|
|
Yes, I too have witnessed Abienno's corruption while I was a temporary member of USM. He often spoke about using alternate accounts to fabricate new threats for the group.
He is a very pitiful adolescent schoolchild.
Farewell. |
|
|
Alright then.
Here you go, as desired:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YewVugPHon4 |
|
|
Unless we are discussing the mathematics of politics. |
|
|
Analyze me as necessary.
Your analysis will be rather inaccurate, unfortunately. |
|
|
I would not state that an individual could "look" like an online-dating user.
You do not seem to fit any of the idiotic stereotypes expected. Therefore, do not worry. |
|
|
"unfunny"
There was no hilarity in my objective response.
You are quite naive, obviously. |
|
|
The majority of users on the Off-Topic subsection are envious of Vineshroom's superior intelligence.
He has created many assemblers himself using only binary sequences and C. The other individuals have not. |
|
|
"pfptpfptpftpfahahahahahahahahahahahaha"
Hmm, Slydexia?
It is quite true. |
|
|
"oh and knowing how to code doesn't make someone smart"
Neither does social-naivety make an individual unintelligent. |
|
|
"this was never implied"
Exactly. It was explicitly stated.
"if he was smart he'd know that the people who are "attacking" him are purposely trying to make him mad" |
|
|
Leftism as a whole is fundamentally flawed.
That is why rightists are gaining national dominance. |
|
|
This is very good then.
Only naive users would go to a Script-Builder hosted by an imbecile such as Heartstrings. |
|
|
"sb isn't script builder dingus"
Ah, novice mistake. I merely expected that your proficiency in Spanish linguistics would allow you to easily alternate between various syntactical systems.
Unfortunately however, you are a mediocre student. |
|
|
"and im in graduate classes as a freshman so…sorry but im the best"
I believe that the term you seek is "undergraduate."
Authentic students with graduate-level capabilities would not attempt to fabricate nonexistent academic progress over the Internet, given that it is objectively proven.
As to be expected, the typical idiocy of Heartstrings gleams throughout a simplistic discussion. |
|