Moronism
#183423479Friday, February 12, 2016 8:51 AM GMT

"No need to be tongue-in-cheek sassy" My statement was actually rather casual. I never intended to convey any sort of aggression towards you. I suggested an "official" resource on the basis that doing so would likely be much more thorough and in-depth than asking strangers over the Internet who may give you inaccurate/incorrect information.
Moronism
#183423876Friday, February 12, 2016 9:14 AM GMT

"Asking strangers over the Internet creates conversation that may be beneficial to my overall well-being" Ah, alright then, I suppose. We should begin a discussion involving theory-application. I believe that each participant would enjoy that. "Anyways, I really do not know of any ways, at least at the moment, to reduce amount of time taken to sift through a data structure" Which type of algorithm are you currently using? Depending on how you intend to read the components of the data structur...
Moronism
#183553655Sunday, February 14, 2016 2:12 AM GMT

"lua is simple and straightforward" I believe that the issue that this individual is experiencing does not necessarily center around Lua itself; it is due solely to the fact that he/she has not yet become familiar with logical-structuring and manipulation. Symbolic logic can be quite confusing to a novice.
Moronism
#183567345Sunday, February 14, 2016 5:26 AM GMT

Hello adolescent schoolchildren. Lately, I have explored the territory surrounding my place of dwelling. And during each individual expedition, I noted the magnificent geometrical patterns throughout nature. The mere nodes of a single leaf bind together to form often semi-curved yet white, "embedded" lines. It is beautiful. Upon returning home, I thought excessively about the situation. And then I came to a horrid and unfortunate realization: The vast majority of civilians are incapable of rec...
Moronism
#183567493Sunday, February 14, 2016 5:29 AM GMT

"Wow. Using big words. Very smart. Look how smart he is using fancy words. very smart." If my vocabulary use is "smart", then society, on-average at least, is intellectually-suppressed. Simple words are designated to be understood easily.
Moronism
#183567664Sunday, February 14, 2016 5:32 AM GMT

"If you are making a statement, the beginning should be the only capital" In your attempts to correct a highly-intellectual individual such as myself, you made a critical English error. The text segment you are referring to is known as a "Title." Title rules are distinctly different from sentence rules. The American educational system is quite terrible, I see.
Moronism
#183567898Sunday, February 14, 2016 5:36 AM GMT

'People with actually high IQs won't waste time trying to write an extra-long paragraph about their "superiority"' Given that I am obligated to frequently communicate with intellectually-inferior civilians, I am often repulsed by their inability to accurately interpret my implicitly-designed statements. Thus, it was necessary for me to provide a very narrow and otherwise-detailed statement describing my perception of the situation.
Moronism
#183568002Sunday, February 14, 2016 5:39 AM GMT

"I also have an extremely high IQ compared to the average human" Very unlikely. From what I am capable of cautiously interpreting, you seem rather "average" in overall intellectual capability. Resorting to unofficial assumptions does not equate to objective, established fact.
Moronism
#183568270Sunday, February 14, 2016 5:43 AM GMT

"I'm more then positive that you're over-estimating yourself" That is not so. It has been objectively and explicitly established that I am intellectually-superior to the vast majority of society. You continue to deny this only because you would like to magnify your feigned intellectual capabilities within the presence of your Internet social clique. Meanwhile, the evidence within my favor is publicly available for each user to analyze thoroughly.
Moronism
#183568614Sunday, February 14, 2016 5:50 AM GMT

"For someone with such a high IQ you're lacking in vocabulary" Yet another naive statement from an individual such as yourself. It is not necessarily a matter of "quantity", it is a matter of quality. I have not utilized my complete vocabulary during our interaction, as that would be redundant. Logically-structuring a minimal and otherwise finite set of English words is much wiser than solely attempting to use a gigantic set of finite yet disorganized English words. In terms of logical-reas...
Moronism
#183746169Tuesday, February 16, 2016 9:14 AM GMT

Now that I have returned from a temporary "stasis" interval, I can adequately attempt to address only the partially "logical" statements. "I apologize for the misudnerstanding" Aetricity, your solution is rather "concrete" in terms of RBX.Lua-based development. I intend to implement a much more modular approach by simply using custom data structures("Stack" tables, preferentially) to represent each address appropriately. Signals to a "Call Stack" within the MainModule will manage activity qui...
Moronism
#183781953Tuesday, February 16, 2016 11:02 PM GMT

"my post is only logical for those with superior intelligence all others try but fail" You have constructed a splendid illusion. Unfortunately, I cannot receive any direct, sustainable intellectual pleasure by participating in your otherwise futile cycles of role-play. Thus, I would suggest that you either provide a coherent, logically-valid argument, or make your provocation attempts "entertaining" for me.
Moronism
#183782181Tuesday, February 16, 2016 11:05 PM GMT

Yes, you can accomplish this with an algorithm. The programming/scripting language itself is not the most relevant aspect. It is whether the language has the necessary, basic tools to devise an algorithm to accomplish the task. There are plenty of sample AI programs for you to examine.
Moronism
#183787836Wednesday, February 17, 2016 12:20 AM GMT

Yes, I agree. We should cherish recognition from anonymous, impulsive adolescent schoolchildren on an Internet forum. Truthfully, I am glad to be relevant. Are you?
Moronism
#183788038Wednesday, February 17, 2016 12:23 AM GMT

Describe your script's functionality to us.
Moronism
#184135806Monday, February 22, 2016 9:09 AM GMT

"Don't break the rules :/" The thread was within the boundaries of the ROBLOX Community Guidelines. Account termination was entirely unnecessary.
Moronism
#184135928Monday, February 22, 2016 9:19 AM GMT

"If you got banned its because you broke the rules" Ah well, I suppose that "chopbowl" is correct. It is merely virtual content, after-all. Mathematical discussion will gladly continue with or without the account. Although, from an objective viewpoint, my original thread prior to the "Binary Sequences" was deleted invalidly, as it discussed only mathematical sets.
Moronism
#184135990Monday, February 22, 2016 9:24 AM GMT

Consider reading George Polya's "How To Solve It" book. It is quite good.
Moronism
#184153922Monday, February 22, 2016 8:40 PM GMT

"naruto > dbz" Pessimistic illusions.
Moronism
#184211350Tuesday, February 23, 2016 10:32 PM GMT

"It just printed table: and some hex code value I think" This is due to the fact that the actual table itself is being transferred to the "Variadic" function as a parameter. Consequently, repetitively cycling through the "Args" table and printing the data will output the table's memory location in hexadecimal form. Therefore, it is necessary to utilize the "unpack" function to individualize the data within table parameters. Here is an example: N = {1,2,3,4,5}; --First five counting numbers....
Moronism
#184216931Wednesday, February 24, 2016 12:02 AM GMT

Hello LMaD. I am here to discuss mathematics with you.... We will discuss set-builder notation below: Sets are merely mathematical "structures"/objects that enclose other mathematical objects. Typical set notation is through the use of the curly-bracket characters, {}. Sets are quite useful for modeling the properties of "concrete", real-world objects. A sufficient example would be a young child's playpen. The playpen can contain many "toy" objects. Those "toy" objects are enclosed within ...
Moronism
#184217309Wednesday, February 24, 2016 12:08 AM GMT

I was somewhat neglectful, it would seem. I did not discuss the significance of "finite" versus "infinite" sets. The playpen above, "P", is finite. This is due to the fact that playpen "P" has a known limit of toys that it can contain. Infinite sets, such as the the set of all integers, do not have any known limit. They are infinite.
Moronism
#184217411Wednesday, February 24, 2016 12:10 AM GMT

Hello Off-Topic. I am here to discuss mathematics with you.... We will discuss set-builder notation below: Sets are merely mathematical "structures"/objects that enclose other mathematical objects. Typical set notation is through the use of the curly-bracket characters, {}. Sets are quite useful for modeling the properties of "concrete", real-world objects. A sufficient example would be a young child's playpen. The playpen can contain many "toy" objects. Those "toy" objects are enclosed wi...
Moronism
#184217622Wednesday, February 24, 2016 12:13 AM GMT

"tl;dr" Why did you bother to provide a response then?
Moronism
#184217831Wednesday, February 24, 2016 12:17 AM GMT

As in the case of previous occasions, I did not specify the use of the terms "finite" and infinite in relation to set-notation. The playpen above, "P", is finite. This is due to the fact that playpen "P" has a known limit of toys that it can contain. Infinite sets, such as the the set of all integers, do not have any known limit. They are infinite.