|
Hey moderators, if this isn't allowed please tell me in the comments, Im not sure because this is scientific not religious.
Guys, make a argument below that evolution makes sense and I will comment back with a scientific response.
Just trying to make one of my favorite subjects fun on here! Ty |
|
|
well this is good, no one wants to challenge me. I guess that means no one believe that evolution can be possible.
Heres a little nugget of information, the chances of one single cell being formed by random chance exceeds 1x10^100 which also exceeds the mathematical statement that "anything past 1x10^50 is no longer able to be left up to random chance, but something on the outside must have made it happen" |
|
DerplmaoJoin Date: 2014-11-02
Post Count: 626 |
shrek made the earth dummy |
|
|
thats a interesting theory XD |
|
|
also, I did not specify who made the earth, as that would lead down the path to religion which isn't allowed on here. I am saying that evolution cannot be possible |
|
|
"scientific response"
Copy and pasted from Wikipedia |
|
Zipo99Join Date: 2008-10-11
Post Count: 5344 |
And why do you err on the side that evolution is false? |
|
|
Also, the big bang theory cannot be put as real science as there is no actual evidence that it ever happened, it is a abstract theory that abides to certain rules and is being changed constantly. Science requires scientific method which the big bang theory I'm pretty sure doesn't meet |
|
|
Evolution is a preposterous theory.
If I gave you a book, and told you the book wrote itself, would you believe me? Quite simply no but that is what you are saying with evolution, that there was a explosion that made everything. If an explosion made everything there would have to be SOMETHING wrong with us. The very fact that we are alive after a big bang idea like that would be a miracle (let alone the process of being to think)
I mean if we just developed brains that can develop the computers we are typing on, doesn't that sound a bit ridiculous?
Inteligent design makes far more sense |
|
Max2576Join Date: 2011-12-09
Post Count: 537 |
Nothing's real |
|
|
Schrodingers Box, if nothing is put in a box you cannot confirm it is either alive or dead. However it is nothing so it doesn't matter anyways. |
|
|
You are all mindless buffoons. It's clear in the Bible that DONKEY created the Earth, not Shrek. Get it right |
|
DerplmaoJoin Date: 2014-11-02
Post Count: 626 |
oh yah i froget donkeh create wrld |
|
|
i will tell you a story
one time a yoshi found a baby and carried him through tons of places
and he killed a giant turtle and the universe of mario began as baby growed up
the end
FRIENDLY TURKEY |
|
|
another interesting theory, however if the donkey created the universe I feel there would be some sure malfunctions, it would have to be a more-intelligent design. |
|
|
For Yoshi, I have no idea what that means, except for a baby mario reference... |
|
|
|
another fact, the concept of a intelligent creator has been around since the start of time. Thats what has always been taught UNTIL some people created a theory of the universe could be created without a god of some sort. Result: a theory that swept its way into everything because it liberated people to let them do what they want. |
|
Zipo99Join Date: 2008-10-11
Post Count: 5344 |
You have no idea what you are really talking about.
Okay, so first off the big bang has very little to do with evolution. However, as you brought it up I'll humor you.
I don't want to get into the details, so in the beginning there was nothing--until there wasn't. When the big bang happened it sent matter and energy scattering across the universe. Now, things were simpler back then. The universe didn't have so many complex atoms, rather there was just hydrogen, number one on the periodic table. Soon the hydrogen clouds began to get pulled together due to their immense size and gravity. Under this stress hydrogen atoms began to collide and create Helium, atomic number 2. When three helium atoms combine we get Carbon, and so on. This is fusion, and this is how stars are made. Soon the universe was lit up by billions of new stars. The third law of thermodynamics states that the universe will ultimately become entropic. Haha, but that is the beauty of this universe. Instead of entropy, it has become more complex. At first it was the formation of the stars, but eventually life formed on our planet. How life formed I could go into, but I won't for now.
Evolution is a theory that those who can adapt will survive. At its root evolution is just a theory of who survives and who doesn't. Those that do survive will pass on their genetic code to the next generation, and over thousands of years changes can be seen. The common example of this on the micro scale is that of the spotted moth during the Industrial revolution.
Evolution is not about a book that wrote its self, it is about life persisting onward though the universe seeks entropy. Evolution is beautiful. |
|
|
OK OK to deal with part one...
I want proof about all this hydrogen and stuff. Brief logic: was there humans then? No, so who recorded the information?
ITS A THEORY
A guy in a white lab coat said it and you took it word for word because he had a theory which he taught in school.
There is literally no evidence for the big bang, because no one was there to see it.
For the evolution part, I am talking about Darwinian Evolution. The change of a animal from one species to another.
Darwins finches DO NOT count on this, Im saying cat to dog, not cat to different kind of cat. Evolution is adaptation, Darwinian Evolution is ridiculous. We have no proof or recording of 7k years of recordings of humans of any such thing, and it can only be left as a theory. Theres a reason it isn't history you know, its a THEORY |
|
|
For the top part again, where did you gather a ounce of that information other then the internet or text books? There is not a a ounce of physical evidence for the big bang. |
|
Zipo99Join Date: 2008-10-11
Post Count: 5344 |
So, I'll respond to this thread in more depth tomorrow when my eyes are not prompted to close.
I will say this for now, your faulty logic aside, do you have any proof of your counter argument? You mentioned the concept of a creator has been around since the start of time. The fact that there were no humans alive at the start of time to record such a thing aside, do you have proof of a creator?
Also, I am talking about Darwinian evolution. Heck, I've read On The Origins of Species. I would gander you haven't and you are just repeating back what someone else said. Evolution is misrepresented by you. |
|
Zipo99Join Date: 2008-10-11
Post Count: 5344 |
Oh, and this is a cliche response, but gravity is a theory and you can see how well it is working out. Just because something is a theory and not a law does not mean it is any less sound. It is just misinterpreted by those that don't understand science. |
|
|
Well I have a few points to make. Again, no proof of Darwinian Evolution. ALSO in the last days of Charles Darwin even he admitted that his theory was ridiculous. Look it up.
For proof of a intelligent creator, I have loads of information that would be considered religious and I can't share.
(for instance, me seeing people who had been stuck to a wheelchair suddenly getting up and running around a room, saw with my own eyes.)
BUT since I can't argue with that, he's what Ive got, the Bible (I'm using at as a scientific textbook right now) has not been scientificly de-confirmed. Everything in the Bible matches up with modern science.
ALSO the idea that there were no humans at the start of time goes for the argument of Evolution and cannot be used in this context, because Im saying that there were humans that recorded it all. Biblical accounts say that Moses wrote all this down form divine inspiration by God. Same with many other religions.
Also the very chances of evolution being possible are astronomical. 60 trillion cells in the human body, the chance of one cell being randomly formed have a 1/10^130 chance.
but the fact of the matter is that you will believe the scientists, look up this video "tough questions that atheists couldn't answer" by Ray Comfort. (No I am NOT citing them for this info.) |
|
|
Gravity is not a theory its a law. LAW of Gravity |
|