|
Let me make this pretty formal, huh? Going to organize it in an essay style.
| Topic: Supposed decaying of the SF community
| Argumentative essay
| Length: Short
There is a sort of viral disease running through the body of the clanning community in which the virus itself is the thought of a "decaying" of the SF clan community. The very thought of this I find to be unsubstantiated and just common "street talk". People continue to express that this is so without any real reason or need. Even so, what good will complaining do to mend this supposed problem?
Let's get to the real mambo now. People may argue that there is a decay in the percentage of success from the beginning of sword clanning to now, but that is normal for ANY type of organization, not only this sector of clanning. There is also the argument that "people favor more gun clans that sword clans and thus, this creates a problem for sword clans". There is no real way to substantiate this claim. How will you ask this to the MILLIONS of people that are on this game? Who would take their time to ask so many people? It's an alogism. A third trail of thought is: "sword clans don't take skill, therefore, they aren't good". Where can I begin saying how stupid of a comparison this is. Both are basic mouse clicking. All you need is to practice how to master technique of the way of mouse clicking you need for your preferred style of combat. Both take technique. Fourth and finally, there is another thought that "the SF community is toxic and generic and just unappealing". Well, to certain extent, I can agree with this, sadly. There is a mass toxicity within that community and very little originality and appeal, however, the toxicity is also present in the gun community and other parts of clanning; it's not unique to SF. The genericity issue and low appeal issue have proper grounding, in my opinion. One of the few arguments that actually does have some base. Clans like The Kiddy Clan, Skilled Force, Royal Blood, Unstable, The Dominant Supremacy, etc. gained or have gained fame principally because of the fact that they bear almost no regulations. They don't need originality because they attract people by just being centers for letting people do whatever they want. It's despicable but it happens. I won't mention more cases because there are too many. But the disproving continues with many of the "arguments".
So, to conclude, a grand majority of these so-called "arguments" I have proved and have concluded are baseless and illogical. The Sword Fighting Community is alive and it is growing. People need to stop complaining if they see it wrong and help it if they think something is going wrong. Whining and claiming things that are untrue won't do anything to help. Grand figures like Gandhi, Dr. King, Lenin, etc. accomplished what they did by doing, not whining.
Thank you for taking the time to read this.
Post opinions. |
|
|
TinpotOpsJoin Date: 2012-07-22
Post Count: 813 |
Let me make this pretty formal, huh? Going to organize it in an essay style.
| Topic: Supposed decaying of the SF community
| Argumentative essay
| Length: Short
There is a sort of viral disease running through the body of the clanning community in which the virus itself is the thought of a "decaying" of the SF clan community. The very thought of this I find to be unsubstantiated and just common "street talk". People continue to express that this is so without any real reason or need. Even so, what good will complaining do to mend this supposed problem?
Let's get to the real mambo now. People may argue that there is a decay in the percentage of success from the beginning of sword clanning to now, but that is normal for ANY type of organization, not only this sector of clanning. There is also the argument that "people favor more gun clans that sword clans and thus, this creates a problem for sword clans". There is no real way to substantiate this claim. How will you ask this to the MILLIONS of people that are on this game? Who would take their time to ask so many people? It's an alogism. A third trail of thought is: "sword clans don't take skill, therefore, they aren't good". Where can I begin saying how stupid of a comparison this is. Both are basic mouse clicking. All you need is to practice how to master technique of the way of mouse clicking you need for your preferred style of combat. Both take technique. Fourth and finally, there is another thought that "the SF community is toxic and generic and just unappealing". Well, to certain extent, I can agree with this, sadly. There is a mass toxicity within that community and very little originality and appeal, however, the toxicity is also present in the gun community and other parts of clanning; it's not unique to SF. The genericity issue and low appeal issue have proper grounding, in my opinion. One of the few arguments that actually does have some base. Clans like The Kiddy Clan, Skilled Force, Royal Blood, Unstable, The Dominant Supremacy, etc. gained or have gained fame principally because of the fact that they bear almost no regulations. They don't need originality because they attract people by just being centers for letting people do whatever they want. It's despicable but it happens. I won't mention more cases because there are too many. But the disproving continues with many of the "arguments".
So, to conclude, a grand majority of these so-called "arguments" I have proved and have concluded are baseless and illogical. The Sword Fighting Community is alive and it is growing. People need to stop complaining if they see it wrong and help it if they think something is going wrong. Whining and claiming things that are untrue won't do anything to help. Grand figures like Gandhi, Dr. King, Lenin, etc. accomplished what they did by doing, not whining.
Thank you for taking the time to read this.
Post opinions.
| Argumentative essay
| Length: Short
|
|
|
|
I'm sorry, but the length of your second paragraph hurt me. I know it's unrelated, but in the future I beg of you to space things out more. |
|
|
Yeah everybody who says SF community is dying is wrong, because it's been long dead
|
|
|
"Yeah everybody who says SF community is dying is wrong, because it's been long dead"
OOOOOOOOHHHHHH GET REKT |
|
SyrnixJoin Date: 2016-09-23
Post Count: 1272 |
Glory to Royal Bidoof |
|
whitestoxJoin Date: 2007-03-13
Post Count: 1472 |
it's already dead you're just dancing on the grave at this point
|
|
Royj1256Join Date: 2013-07-24
Post Count: 7941 |
IT's already dead |
|
|
Ah, yes, another argument to disprove.
How is it dead if there is growth in it? Something is not "dead" until there is no activity among it at all. Nevertheless, there ARE sword clans and they are STRIVING. Examples: my own clan, Kingdom of Alvor, Skilled Force (even if it's based on having no rules), Royal Blood (same reason), etc.
These clans attract people and are active, even more so than many gun clans.
Shut up about sword clans being dead, they aren't. |
|
|
|
| Topic: Supposed decaying of the SF community
| Argumentative essay
| Length: Short
|
|
STlFFJoin Date: 2012-08-04
Post Count: 1851 |
tl;dr
Are you saying you'd rather see the 'If Vaktus replies I will...' threads than actual relevant clan stuff?
|
|
|
Let me make this pretty formal, huh? Going to organize it in an essay style.
| Topic: Supposed decaying of the SF community
| Argumentative essay
| Length: Short
There is a sort of viral disease running through the body of the clanning community in which the virus itself is the thought of a "decaying" of the SF clan community. The very thought of this I find to be unsubstantiated and just common "street talk". People continue to express that this is so without any real reason or need. Even so, what good will complaining do to mend this supposed problem?
Let's get to the real mambo now. People may argue that there is a decay in the percentage of success from the beginning of sword clanning to now, but that is normal for ANY type of organization, not only this sector of clanning. There is also the argument that "people favor more gun clans that sword clans and thus, this creates a problem for sword clans". There is no real way to substantiate this claim. How will you ask this to the MILLIONS of people that are on this game? Who would take their time to ask so many people? It's an alogism. A third trail of thought is: "sword clans don't take skill, therefore, they aren't good". Where can I begin saying how stupid of a comparison this is. Both are basic mouse clicking. All you need is to practice how to master technique of the way of mouse clicking you need for your preferred style of combat. Both take technique. Fourth and finally, there is another thought that "the SF community is toxic and generic and just unappealing". Well, to certain extent, I can agree with this, sadly. There is a mass toxicity within that community and very little originality and appeal, however, the toxicity is also present in the gun community and other parts of clanning; it's not unique to SF. The genericity issue and low appeal issue have proper grounding, in my opinion. One of the few arguments that actually does have some base. Clans like The Kiddy Clan, Skilled Force, Royal Blood, Unstable, The Dominant Supremacy, etc. gained or have gained fame principally because of the fact that they bear almost no regulations. They don't need originality because they attract people by just being centers for letting people do whatever they want. It's despicable but it happens. I won't mention more cases because there are too many. But the disproving continues with many of the "arguments".
So, to conclude, a grand majority of these so-called "arguments" I have proved and have concluded are baseless and illogical. The Sword Fighting Community is alive and it is growing. People need to stop complaining if they see it wrong and help it if they think something is going wrong. Whining and claiming things that are untrue won't do anything to help. Grand figures like Gandhi, Dr. King, Lenin, etc. accomplished what they did by doing, not whining.
Thank you for taking the time to read this.
Post opinions. |
|
|
Only three people have actually posted decent answers...
Man, C&G. |
|
19_08Join Date: 2016-01-29
Post Count: 8328 |
Sir, your uniform is copied.
|
|
STlFFJoin Date: 2012-08-04
Post Count: 1851 |
Don't complain about C&G when complaining about valid topics regarding 'Clans and Guilds,' it's kinda hypocritical when you think about it.
|
|
|
Commit, no.
STlFF, I can't have people keep saying this. It's stupid, there are real things to talk about than this stupidity already. Sure, it's one on-topic thing, but it's just got to stop already. It's a baseless topic. |
|
19_08Join Date: 2016-01-29
Post Count: 8328 |
Yes it is copeid from those TSK groups.
Dumb skid.
|
|
|
"Yeah everybody who says SF community is dying is wrong, because it's been long dead"
Supah hot fire. |
|
|
PoIariseJoin Date: 2010-01-12
Post Count: 1809 |
Agreed
-- Simply Sublime |
|
|
"People may argue that there is a decay in the percentage of success from the beginning of sword clanning to now, but that is normal for ANY type of organization, not only this sector of clanning"
so the sword community is dying. shot yourself in the foot pretty quickly |
|
SyrnixJoin Date: 2016-09-23
Post Count: 1272 |
Glory to Royal Bidoof |
|