bills11111
#214347840Friday, April 14, 2017 8:44 PM GMT

just die u ####
liilzy
#214348211Friday, April 14, 2017 8:48 PM GMT

There's always going to be that toxic guy.
Arthur_Lionheart
#214359245Friday, April 14, 2017 10:56 PM GMT

Shadow, if you could appropriate comprehend what I said...I mentioned that ALL organizations decay from their beginning point. This always happens, learn to read and comprehend.
Squirt_lel
#214359545Friday, April 14, 2017 11:00 PM GMT

The Dominant Supremacy was a strict clan for almost the entire time it was open, and was only slightly less strict during the most recent era but was originally built on the idea of being strict.
Arthur_Lionheart
#214359621Friday, April 14, 2017 11:01 PM GMT

Most I heard was that it was really laid back. TDS being strict is news to me. All I heard about it was that it was just like Skilled Force, RB, etc. Too laid back for their own good.
Zerkius
#214360056Friday, April 14, 2017 11:08 PM GMT

>inserts ignorant, stupid, and irrelevant gun clanner comment<
Zerkius
#214360108Friday, April 14, 2017 11:08 PM GMT

TDS wasn't that strict, they are how every clan should be. A little bit of discipline and a little bit of fun.
Zerkius
#214360352Friday, April 14, 2017 11:12 PM GMT

Most people who say sword clans are dead are just trolls without a brain. Because at this point all you have to do is look through the blinds to see the truth, they are alive and thriving. Some areas more than others, but generally they are.
CrafterboeyMiner
#214360529Friday, April 14, 2017 11:14 PM GMT

Same thing would apply for "Clans are dying" 0 = the life I will never have
ywisis
#214360991Friday, April 14, 2017 11:20 PM GMT

SF clans can get more than gun clans on average.
Arthur_Lionheart
#214410566Saturday, April 15, 2017 2:32 PM GMT

True stuff, guys. And yes, this could also compare with "Clans are dying".
19_08
#214410716Saturday, April 15, 2017 2:34 PM GMT

TheSole, you know you can hire an uniform maker for only 10k? No need to use copied unis bro
Arthur_Lionheart
#214410754Saturday, April 15, 2017 2:35 PM GMT

They're not copied. Show me the proof of them being copied.
19_08
#214411361Saturday, April 15, 2017 2:44 PM GMT

ID of yours : ######### ID of ### of the many other copies : #########
19_08
#214411430Saturday, April 15, 2017 2:45 PM GMT

https://www.roblox.com/catalog/577954025/- One of the many copies ^ Which still where made before yours, which if you need proof, just look at the ID.
19_08
#214411458Saturday, April 15, 2017 2:45 PM GMT

were* dammit
chloropIast
#214411858Saturday, April 15, 2017 2:50 PM GMT

Let me make this pretty formal, huh? Going to organize it in an essay style. | Topic: Supposed decaying of the SF community | Argumentative essay | Length: Short There is a sort of viral disease running through the body of the clanning community in which the virus itself is the thought of a "decaying" of the SF clan community. The very thought of this I find to be unsubstantiated and just common "street talk". People continue to express that this is so without any real reason or need. Even so, what good will complaining do to mend this supposed problem? Let's get to the real mambo now. People may argue that there is a decay in the percentage of success from the beginning of sword clanning to now, but that is normal for ANY type of organization, not only this sector of clanning. There is also the argument that "people favor more gun clans that sword clans and thus, this creates a problem for sword clans". There is no real way to substantiate this claim. How will you ask this to the MILLIONS of people that are on this game? Who would take their time to ask so many people? It's an alogism. A third trail of thought is: "sword clans don't take skill, therefore, they aren't good". Where can I begin saying how stupid of a comparison this is. Both are basic mouse clicking. All you need is to practice how to master technique of the way of mouse clicking you need for your preferred style of combat. Both take technique. Fourth and finally, there is another thought that "the SF community is toxic and generic and just unappealing". Well, to certain extent, I can agree with this, sadly. There is a mass toxicity within that community and very little originality and appeal, however, the toxicity is also present in the gun community and other parts of clanning; it's not unique to SF. The genericity issue and low appeal issue have proper grounding, in my opinion. One of the few arguments that actually does have some base. Clans like The Kiddy Clan, Skilled Force, Royal Blood, Unstable, The Dominant Supremacy, etc. gained or have gained fame principally because of the fact that they bear almost no regulations. They don't need originality because they attract people by just being centers for letting people do whatever they want. It's despicable but it happens. I won't mention more cases because there are too many. But the disproving continues with many of the "arguments". So, to conclude, a grand majority of these so-called "arguments" I have proved and have concluded are baseless and illogical. The Sword Fighting Community is alive and it is growing. People need to stop complaining if they see it wrong and help it if they think something is going wrong. Whining and claiming things that are untrue won't do anything to help. Grand figures like Gandhi, Dr. King, Lenin, etc. accomplished what they did by doing, not whining. Thank you for taking the time to read this. Post opinions. | Argumentative essay | Length: Short
Arthur_Lionheart
#214417544Saturday, April 15, 2017 4:11 PM GMT

Why do people keep emphasizing the "argumentative essay" and "length: short" part? It's debating arguments and different view points. It's argumentative. And it's very short considering what the normal requirement for how long an essay should be is much longer.
TheShadowMessage
#214424884Saturday, April 15, 2017 5:54 PM GMT

"Shadow, if you could appropriate comprehend what I said...I mentioned that ALL organizations decay from their beginning point." I know exactly what you said. Did I claim that other clans were not dying? No. I never said that. No need to use straw men. "There is a sort of viral disease running through the body of the clanning community in which the virus itself is the thought of a 'decaying' of the SF clan community" "Topic: Supposed decaying of the SF community" You yourself said that it's decaying. If all organizations are decaying, which is what you said, then the SF clan community is decaying. So your thesis is incorrect and your essay lacks logical consistency.
phantomfuI
#214425205Saturday, April 15, 2017 5:58 PM GMT

Let me make this pretty formal, huh? Going to organize it in an essay style. | Topic: Supposed decaying of the SF community | Argumentative essay | Length: Short There is a sort of viral disease running through the body of the clanning community in which the virus itself is the thought of a "decaying" of the SF clan community. The very thought of this I find to be unsubstantiated and just common "street talk". People continue to express that this is so without any real reason or need. Even so, what good will complaining do to mend this supposed problem? Let's get to the real mambo now. People may argue that there is a decay in the percentage of success from the beginning of sword clanning to now, but that is normal for ANY type of organization, not only this sector of clanning. There is also the argument that "people favor more gun clans that sword clans and thus, this creates a problem for sword clans". There is no real way to substantiate this claim. How will you ask this to the MILLIONS of people that are on this game? Who would take their time to ask so many people? It's an alogism. A third trail of thought is: "sword clans don't take skill, therefore, they aren't good". Where can I begin saying how stupid of a comparison this is. Both are basic mouse clicking. All you need is to practice how to master technique of the way of mouse clicking you need for your preferred style of combat. Both take technique. Fourth and finally, there is another thought that "the SF community is toxic and generic and just unappealing". Well, to certain extent, I can agree with this, sadly. There is a mass toxicity within that community and very little originality and appeal, however, the toxicity is also present in the gun community and other parts of clanning; it's not unique to SF. The genericity issue and low appeal issue have proper grounding, in my opinion. One of the few arguments that actually does have some base. Clans like The Kiddy Clan, Skilled Force, Royal Blood, Unstable, The Dominant Supremacy, etc. gained or have gained fame principally because of the fact that they bear almost no regulations. They don't need originality because they attract people by just being centers for letting people do whatever they want. It's despicable but it happens. I won't mention more cases because there are too many. But the disproving continues with many of the "arguments". So, to conclude, a grand majority of these so-called "arguments" I have proved and have concluded are baseless and illogical. The Sword Fighting Community is alive and it is growing. People need to stop complaining if they see it wrong and help it if they think something is going wrong. Whining and claiming things that are untrue won't do anything to help. Grand figures like Gandhi, Dr. King, Lenin, etc. accomplished what they did by doing, not whining. Thank you for taking the time to read this. Post opinions. | Argumentative essay | Length: Short
BrokenRyan916
#214425358Saturday, April 15, 2017 6:01 PM GMT

Sole just asking, who even are you?
Syrnix
#214466214Sunday, April 16, 2017 2:57 AM GMT

He's a middle aged man living in his moms basement who has nothing to do with his life, so he attempts to trigger C&G. ### tho sen <33
TimeBurnz
#214466237Sunday, April 16, 2017 2:57 AM GMT

tldr I wonder what grenades taste like | Devin
Gun_Lord
#214466280Sunday, April 16, 2017 2:58 AM GMT

Let me make this pretty formal, huh? Going to organize it in an essay style. | Topic: Supposed decaying of the SF community | Argumentative essay | Length: Short There is a sort of viral disease running through the body of the clanning community in which the virus itself is the thought of a "decaying" of the SF clan community. The very thought of this I find to be unsubstantiated and just common "street talk". People continue to express that this is so without any real reason or need. Even so, what good will complaining do to mend this supposed problem? Let's get to the real mambo now. People may argue that there is a decay in the percentage of success from the beginning of sword clanning to now, but that is normal for ANY type of organization, not only this sector of clanning. There is also the argument that "people favor more gun clans that sword clans and thus, this creates a problem for sword clans". There is no real way to substantiate this claim. How will you ask this to the MILLIONS of people that are on this game? Who would take their time to ask so many people? It's an alogism. A third trail of thought is: "sword clans don't take skill, therefore, they aren't good". Where can I begin saying how stupid of a comparison this is. Both are basic mouse clicking. All you need is to practice how to master technique of the way of mouse clicking you need for your preferred style of combat. Both take technique. Fourth and finally, there is another thought that "the SF community is toxic and generic and just unappealing". Well, to certain extent, I can agree with this, sadly. There is a mass toxicity within that community and very little originality and appeal, however, the toxicity is also present in the gun community and other parts of clanning; it's not unique to SF. The genericity issue and low appeal issue have proper grounding, in my opinion. One of the few arguments that actually does have some base. Clans like The Kiddy Clan, Skilled Force, Royal Blood, Unstable, The Dominant Supremacy, etc. gained or have gained fame principally because of the fact that they bear almost no regulations. They don't need originality because they attract people by just being centers for letting people do whatever they want. It's despicable but it happens. I won't mention more cases because there are too many. But the disproving continues with many of the "arguments". So, to conclude, a grand majority of these so-called "arguments" I have proved and have concluded are baseless and illogical. The Sword Fighting Community is alive and it is growing. People need to stop complaining if they see it wrong and help it if they think something is going wrong. Whining and claiming things that are untrue won't do anything to help. Grand figures like Gandhi, Dr. King, Lenin, etc. accomplished what they did by doing, not whining. Thank you for taking the time to read this. Post opinions. Theyre still toxic and should die again and stay dead. |The C&G Wizard|
Arthur_Lionheart
#214513603Sunday, April 16, 2017 5:35 PM GMT

Shadow, "the thought". You can't read well, can you? Twice. --- Broken, the argument of "relevancy" is one of the most immature and stupid things you could say, man. Jesus, if you use that you're only making yourself a joke. Syrnix/Cow, still mad I figured you out and kept your sorry hind out of my clan?