AnonyAnonymous
#148094114Friday, October 17, 2014 5:57 AM GMT

Well, not necessarily vocal in the context that humans do linguistically yet their linguistic communication consists essentially of "Signals" through various methods.
AnonyAnonymous
#148677003Monday, October 27, 2014 4:31 AM GMT

"a simple look into society states otherwise. once again its just inferior ppl saying being different is good. its just all a way of making things seem better for themselves" To a somewhat limited degree, the differences between each individual human are certainly positive as it creates potential for the creation of plenty of beneficial ideas and methods for linguistic revision. Simply because a person considers themselves superior to other humans doesn't make them superior nor does it indi...
AnonyAnonymous
#148679196Monday, October 27, 2014 5:53 AM GMT

I would have to disagree significantly. Explaining linguistic knowledge and analyzing aspects of history are both fundamental skills in enabling a person to greatly comprehend vital components of generalized grammatical and interpretation. Additionally, the cultural background of each subject mentioned is diverse and requires a significant amount of knowledge from more than simply just one source to explain the diversity well.
AnonyAnonymous
#148697051Monday, October 27, 2014 7:19 PM GMT

Well, while it's certainly true that "Programming" can be somewhat complex for a beginner to understand, try to think of it like this: Programming is essentially the creation of instructions to be translated internally and externally for computational manipulation. Just as a person wouldn't learn how to properly utilize English in a short duration of time, "Programming" is a linguistic network of skills that have to be consistently reformed and implemented based on your logical ideas to develo...
AnonyAnonymous
#148827311Thursday, October 30, 2014 1:05 AM GMT

"@anon isn't that the purpose of the intro why write it again? it seems repetitive" The introduction merely just shows the person certain segments of the core information to help the person interpret the story more accurately, each individual has a differing perception of the usage of linguistic convention. While it's certainly true that if the preceding paragraphs are conveyed accurately then misinterpretation is significantly minimized, a person with an entirely different perspective of ...
AnonyAnonymous
#148949100Saturday, November 01, 2014 4:45 AM GMT

"no one listens to your garbage pseudo intellectual" Alright then. Although, becoming angry enough to begin posting on threads only to insult other users because you disagree with their individual pattern of linguistic communication skills simply isn't worth it. I would suggest focusing on something else that you enjoy rather than wasting your own time becoming upset.
AnonyAnonymous
#148985266Saturday, November 01, 2014 8:33 PM GMT

"If I stand up and sound wise, does that make me wise and does that make me right?" It certainly doesn't, mimicking a particular pattern of linguistic convention doesn't necessarily indicate that an individual has an extensive depth of understanding of the actual significance of the subject they're discussing.
AnonyAnonymous
#149219682Wednesday, November 05, 2014 8:33 AM GMT

Suggestions can certainly be helpful, depending on the content and the linguistic convention of the suggestion given to the person. You won't certainly won't need this users optional suggestions however as each individual has a different perception and method of interaction with reality.
AnonyAnonymous
#149359589Saturday, November 08, 2014 2:25 AM GMT

"i find it sad when people think big words have big meanings just say 'my argument still stands despite previous logical fallacies' it's that simple" That's rather irrelevant to the discussion, each individual has their own preferred method for linguistic convention. Also, my statement referred directly to a post made by another individual user rather than myself.
AnonyAnonymous
#149779488Saturday, November 15, 2014 3:46 AM GMT

Ah yes, the abstract concepts scattered through the various branches of "Mathematics" are certainly splendid components for the development of accurate linguistic interpretation and reasoning regarding the language itself.
AnonyAnonymous
#151441490Wednesday, December 10, 2014 6:03 AM GMT

"You'll be able to interpret algorithms much better." The intention of the "Hour-Of-Code" program is to introduce individuals of varying age-groups to programming by tasking them with thinking algorithmically to develop an efficient solution to the relatively "Simplistic" tasks provided. If you can develop proficient algorithmic instructions, It becomes much more simpler to grasp the various linguistic patterns in general programming/scripting.
AnonyAnonymous
#151568252Saturday, December 13, 2014 12:23 AM GMT

"@Anony it's okay to say that I'm in love it's better to be corny than a nerd." That's my preferred method for linguistic convention, It's effective if the individual is able to interpret it with minimal difficulty. Onto the central subject, however, It's plausible that the hormonal effects will intensify at a central point and then allay significantly.